Department of Health Home A to Z Topics About the Department of Health Site Map Contact Us - Opens in a new window

Epidemiology Home

Health Topics (A-Z)

Related Links

Contact Us

   

Florida Department of HealthEPI UPDATE

A weekly publication by the Bureau of Epidemiology

For November 24,1999

"The reason for collecting, analyzing and disseminating information on a disease is to control that disease. Collection and analysis should not be allowed to consume resources if action does not follow."

--Foege WH et al. Int. J of Epidemiology 1976; 5:29-37.

Richard S. Hopkins, MD, MSPH, Bureau Chief, State Epidemiologist

Don Ward, Surveillance Section Administrator, Epi Update Managing Editor

Jill H. Parker, MSP, Epi Update Editor

Bureau of Epidemiology Frequent Contributors:

Steven Wiersma, MD, MPH,

Deputy State Epidemiologist

William J. Bigler, PhD, MS,

Senior Epidemiologist

Jodi Baldy, MPH,

Biological Scientist IV

Ursula E. Bauer, PhD,

Chronic Disease Epidemiologist

John Werth, MA,

Bureau Education Coordinator

Lisa Conti, DVM, MPH,

State Public Health Veterinarian

Regional Epidemiologists:

Dolly Katz, PhD, MPH,

SE Florida

Roger Sanderson, RN, MA,

SW Florida

Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD,

NE Florida Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD,

Zuber Mulla, MSPH,

Central Florida Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD,

Gérard Krause, MD, DTMH,

NW Florida

Please print out this material and share with epidemiology staff, county health department directors, administrators, medical directors, nursing directors, environmental health directors and others with an interest in information of this type. Thank you.

The Bureau of Epidemiology is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for consultation at our main number (850/245-4401) PLEASE NOTE: Consultation after 5 p.m. & on weekends is intended for emergencies.

In this issue:

1.    Grand Rounds Reminder

2.    Outbreak of Presumed Ciguatera Intoxication in Orange County

3.    Inter-County Cooperation in Follow-up of Laboratory Reports

4.    Influenza Surveillance Update

5.    Florida Past: Gratitude for a Humanitarian Gesture

6.    Weekly Disease Table

 

1. Reminder!! Grand Rounds for November 30, 1999:

"Global Polio Eradication: The Importance of Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance," presented by Dr. Gérard Krause, MD, DrMed, DTMH, CDC Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer, Bureau of Epidemiology

John F. Werth, M.A.

11:00 AM – 12:00 PM EST

Session 9 will be presented by Dr. Gérard Krause, MD, DrMed, DTMH, CDC Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer, Bureau of Epidemiology, Florida Department of Health.

This presentation will provide an introduction to the four strategies of the global eradication of polio conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO). The focus will be the surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis, which is one of the four strategies for polio eradication. Based upon his experience as a WHO consultant in Niger, West Africa, Dr. Krause will demonstrate how a surveillance system for acute flaccid paralysis was implemented in one of the poorest countries in Africa.

Additional information and tips about accessing information about the Grand Rounds may be found on the Bureau of Epidemiology intranet website.

2. Outbreak of Presumed Ciguatera Intoxication in Orange County

Bill Toth, County Epidemiologist, MPH, Orange County Health Department:

Information correct as of Nov. 23

The Orange County Health Department received a report from Florida Hospital South on Saturday November 20, 1999 regarding three (3) patients they had seen in their emergency department with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bradycardia, depressed blood pressures, tingling and numbness around their mouths, and numbing and tingling in their hands and feet. One individual described a hot and cold sensation reversal. The RN in the department told the epidemiology section of another man who was hospitalized at Winter Park Hospital with similar condition; his hospitalization was confirmed by telephone.

These individuals were from five parties and two employees of the restaurant. All had eaten mahi-mahi or amberjack fish on Friday November 19 at Houston’s, on 215 S. Orlando Ave, Winter Park. Their onsets of illness were from 3-12 hours after ingesting fish at the restaurant. The onset window, signs and symptoms were compatible with ciguatoxin exposure (the incubation for scombroid poisoning is a few minutes to one hour). Exposure was on Thursday, November 18 and Friday, November 19.

A call was made immediately to Houston’s for the purpose of determining if additional cases existed and to have them hold, in the freezer, those mahi and amberjack fillets remaining. They were asked to reveal their supplier for those fish. The fillets are being held for investigators from FDA as are the invoices for fish received on November 16-20 from Supreme Seafood, Inc.(mahi-mahi) and Gary’s Seafood Specialties, Inc. (amberjack). FDA is in the process of checking the distribution of the fish as well as sending it to be tested for ciguatoxin. Fish received are mostly used the same day (approximately 30 lbs. used per type of fish per day), those stores left over are kept at proper holding temperatures and used first the following day. Restaurant managers adamantly deny substituting one type of fish for another (the question being whether 2 types of fish are actually involved).

The Orange county epidemiologist made a site visit to Houston’s, on Monday November 22, concurrent with Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR). A copy of the invoices was made for both parties. A regulatory inspection was conducted by DBPR, which revealed no major infractions. Additional names of complainants were turned over to the epidemiologist for follow up. A party of 13 reported as many as 4 ill with compatible illness and onset times and exposures. As of this report, 16 are ill (including two restaurant employees) with one hospitalization (discharged on November 20). This is a dynamic number and may change as more is learned.

3. Inter-County Cooperation in Follow-up of Laboratory Reports

Don Ward, Surveillance Section Administrator, and

Beverly Keith, BSN, RN, Nursing Program Specialist, Orange County Health Department

This article clarifies the points made in an article entitled, "Inter-County Transmission of Laboratory Information," which appeared in the January 22, 1999, issue of the "Epi Update."

Occasionally, most often when information on laboratory reports is incomplete, the Bureau of Epidemiology sends laboratory results to a county health department that is different from that of the patient’s residence. After the "wrong" county receives the laboratory report and determines that the patient lives in another county, they forward the report to the correct county. If appropriate information is missing, further (and often redundant) action will be required of the recipient county. To avoid this often involved and redundant effort, we suggest the following procedure.

When a county health department receives a laboratory report which requires a call to a physician's office for diagnostic, demographic and/or epidemiologic data (and the patient is discovered through the call to be the resident of another county) CHD staff should obtain the same information as for a resident of the CHD calling the physician. That information should then be transmitted to the appropriate county for morbidity reporting and any necessary follow-up. This practice will keep the recipient county from making additional phone calls to the physician's office, which is not only annoying to the physician's office but also many times is a long distance call from the recipient county health department. Information that is important to obtain includes:

  1. Data necessary to complete the Communicable Disease Morbidity Surveillance Reporting Form (HRS-H Form 2016)
  2. name, date of birth, sex, race, hispanic (yes or no), zip code, onset date (to compute the event date) imported status, outbreak status, occupation and daycare status.

  3. Other information that is appropriate for determining morbidity according to the current case definition

3. Parent's name (if a child)

4. Was the patient symptomatic? If yes, what were their symptoms?

5. Treatment, if any

6. Is disease acute or chronic ( e.g., in the case of hepatitis B or C)?

  1. Permission to contact the patient or family
  2. Request that lab work be faxed from the physician's office to the recipient county, for cases which the state e-pi office requires a copy of the lab data
  3. Other information that the physician feels may be useful in follow-up

Epidemiologic needs may necessitate further follow-up by the county of the patient’s residence, but a little extra effort by the county conducting the initial investigation may save time, prevent unnecessary effort and contribute greatly to case prevention.

Note: We recognize that there are special circumstances in which these recommendations are difficult to follow (such as when large numbers of laboratory reports go to the CHD in which a major provider is located because most laboratory reports from that provider have incomplete information). In such circumstances, the best strategic approach would be to improve the completeness of reporting information...Eds

 

4. Influenza Summary Update Week 45 (week ending November 13 1999)

Carina Blackmore, MS Vet Med. PhD

National: Since October 3, 1999, laboratory confirmed influenza A virus infections were reported from 35 states. Influenza B has been reported from 3 states. Both influenza A and B were isolated in Florida during this time period. Minnesota and Wisconsin reported regional influenza activity as assessed by state and territorial epidemiologists, and thirty-six other states reported sporadic influenza activity.

Of the total patient visits to sentinel physicians, 1% were due to ILI (influenza-like-illness) in the US overall. The percentages ranged from 1-2% in all 9 regions. The percentage of pneumonia and influenza deaths reported from the 122 cities was 6.6 %, which is equal to the epidemic threshold for week 45. The percentage of pneumonia and influenza deaths exceeded threshold values for this time of year for the seven weeks prior to week 45. The current increase in influenza related mortality should be interpreted with caution. It is unclear whether this increase in the percentage of deaths is due to early influenza activity, respiratory illness due to some other pathogen, or reporting changes underway in the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System.

Florida During week 45 (7-13 November 1999) laboratory confirmed isolates of influenza A H3N2/Sydney-like were reported from Hillsborough, Indian River, Leon and Volusia counties. Since October 1, 1999, influenza A has also been isolated from specimens received from Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Collier (A H3N2), Duval, Miami-Dade, Orange and Palm Beach counties. Influenza B/Yamanashi-like has been isolated from Indian River county. Antigens from both influenza A/Sydney and influenza B/Yamanashi are included in the 1999-2000 influenza vaccine. Of the total patient visits to sentinel physicians for Week 45, 2% were due to ILI, the same level of influenza activity reported for the 5 previous weeks. and within the expected range of 0-3%. This week influenza-like illness was reported from providers in 17 (Alachua, Broward, Collier, Duval, Hillsborough, Indian River, Leon, Marion, Miami-Dade, Monroe, Orange, Osceola, Palm Beach, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk and Seminole) of the 29 Florida counties participating in the National Sentinel Physicians Surveillance Network.

Note: for weekly information about respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections, please visit the Bureau of Epidemiology website at www.doh.state.fl.us (choose epidemiology as the subject).

5. Florida Past: Gratitude for a Humanitarian Gesture

William J. Bigler, PhD

Dr. Joseph Y. Porter, reminisces about his many career experiences as State Health Officer in Florida from 1889-1917 in a memoir entitled "Looking Backward Over Fifty Years of Health Work in Florida." This valuable historical record of Public health in the early 1900’s was published in the Journal of the Florida Medical Association, as a series from July 1925 to January 1926. One of the most unusual incidents he describes is an occasion when the railroad baron, Henry M. Flagler gave the State Board of Health a blank check to control an epidemic of yellow Fever in Miami during the summer and fall of 1899. Some excerpts from that account follow:

"An event of the epidemic of yellow fever in Miami in 1899 should always be remembered by the citizens of that city, for it stands forth prominently as an incident of generosity, modestly tendered to a stricken community. The budget of the State Board of Health had been greatly reduced during that year, by reason of a cutting in half of the millage which the statute allowed for the maintenance of the board. Under authority of the Governor this was done, which greatly …deprived the board from monetary assistance to the communities of Key West and Miami…for controlling and restraining the spread of disease. This strained condition of finances came to the attention of Mr. Henry M. Flagler.

Without consulting state health authorities, Mr. Flagler at once telegraphed the State Health Officer to draw on him for whatever funds he needed and required, to render the best of service to the stricken people of Miami. The humanitarian motive which prompted this act of unlimited generosity, which followed, bears testimony to the Christian character of the man to whom Miami, and the entire East Coast of Florida, owes a deep sense of gratitude.

…a temporary hospital was soon constructed for the care of strangers and otherwise homeless sick, of both sexes and races, in which not a death occurred. There are many now living in Miami who are personally acquainted with the incident mentioned, and other gifts of Mr. Flagler during that epidemic. The writer cannot let this opportunity pass without expressing his personal gratitude to … Mr. Flagler, for…placing his pocketbook in his hands with unlimited authority to use… in the epidemic at Miami in 1899."

6. Weekly Disease Table: Week 46

County-Confirmed Cases, Sorted Alphabetically by Disease

(NR represents years that the disease lacked status as a reportable condition)

DISEASE

1996 TO DATE

1997 TO DATE

1998 TO DATE

3 YEAR AVERAGE

TO DATE

1998 TOTAL CASES

1999 TO DATE

Amebiasis 66 50 61 59 91 47
Anthrax 0 0 0 0 0 0
Botulism 0 0 0 0 0 3
Brucellosis 5 0 3 2.7 3 2
Campylobacteriosis 1037 908 756 900.3 975 762
Ciguatera 16 10 7 11 7 2
Cryptosporidiosis 314 141 142 199 203 135
Cyclosporiasis 185 65 6 85.3 6 4
Dengue 0 3 5 2.7 5 5
Diphtheria 0 0 0 0 0 0
E. coli O157:H7 31 45 47 41 57 51
E. coli, other (known serotype) 7 6 9 7.3 12 13
Ehrlichiosis, Human 4 2 0 2 1 1
Encephalitis, Eastern Equine 1 3 0 1.3 0 2
Encephalitis, St. Louis 0 9 1 3.3 2 2
Encephalitis, other (known organism) 6 13 7 8.7 7 3
Encephalitis, post-infectious1 16 13 16 15 21 6
Giardiasis (acute) 1835 1530 1321 1562 1636 1017
Haemophilus influenzae, invasive1 19 24 34 25.7 45 39
Hansen’s Disease (Leprosy) 2 0 4 2 4 3
Hantavirus Infection 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome 1 5 11 5.7 12 7
Hemorrhagic Fever 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hepatitis A 457 506 458 473.7 538 598
Hepatitis B 448 334 359 380.3 466 373
Hepatitis C2 NR NR NR NR NR 47
Hepatitis Non-A, Non-B 75 91 78 81.3 94 16
Hepatitis, perinatal B2 NR NR NR NR NR 2
Hepatitis, unspecified 3 7 20 10 27 11
Hepatitis, +HBsAg, pregnant woman2 NR NR NR NR NR 51
Lead Poisoning 1927 1330 1583 1613.3 1805 661
Legionellosis 38 23 32 31 48 24
Leptospirosis 1 0 2 1 2 1
Listeriosis2 NR NR NR NR NR 24
Lyme Disease 27 33 48 36 71 36
Malaria 73 73 66 70.7 96 74
Measles 1 6 2 3 2 2
Meningococcal Disease (N. meningitidis) 161 132 112 135 133 101
Meningitis, Group B Streptococci 24 15 15 18 22 13
Meningitis, Haemophilus influenzae1 7 12 11 10 12 12
Meningitis, Streptococcus pneumoniae 88 72 72 77.3 96 82
Meningitis, Listeria monocytogenes 6 3 6 5 13 7
Meningitis, other bacterial (including unspecified) 90 57 53 66.7 75 55
Mercury Poisoning 7 2 0 3 4 4
Mumps 9 11 11 10.3 11 4
Neurotoxic Shellfish Poisoning2 3 0 0 1 0 0
Pertussis 85 57 36 59.3 39 67
Pesticide Poisoning 1 0 1 0.7 1 32
Plague 0 0 0 0 0 0
Poliomyelitis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Psittacosis 0 0 2 0.7 2 0
Rabies, Animal 234 251 193 226 215 175
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever 4 4 2 3.3 2 1
Rubella, including congenital 10 3 4 5.7 4 0
Salmonellosis 2318 2070 2434 2274 3038 2395
Shigellosis 1482 1361 1941 1594.7 2343 1191
Smallpox2 NR NR NR NR NR 0
Staphlococcus aureus, (GISA/VISA)2 NR NR NR NR NR 0
Staphlococcus aureus, (GRSA/VRSA)2 NR NR NR NR NR 0
Streptococcal Disease, invasive Group A 7 31 37 25 57 69
Streptococcus pneumoniae, invasive disease 28 189 358 191.7 493 516
Tetanus 3 1 3 2.3 3 2
Toxic Shock Syndrome 0 2 4 2 4 5
Toxoplasmosis 9 6 13 9.3 15 13
Typhoid Fever 22 13 13 16 16 23
Vibrio cholerae (serogrp O1) 0 0 0 0 0 1
Vibrio cholerae (serogrp Non-O1) 4 10 7 7 11 8
Vibrio vulnificus 18 18 30 22 35 20
Vibrio other (including unspecified) 25 26 63 38 73 36
Yellow Fever 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 Haemophilus influenzae can be the agent responsible for disease under three of the reportable conditions listed-: "Haemophilus influenzae, invasive" and under "Encephalitis, post infectious." Cases of Haemophilus influenzae meningitis are reported under "Meningitis, H. influenzae."

2 The reportable disease rule was revised in July, 1999. Kawasaki Disease, Histoplasmosis, Reye Syndrome, and Typhus were deleted from the weekly disease table since cases are no longer reportable as of July 4, 1999. Hepatitis C; perinatal hepatitis B; hepatitis B +HbsAg, pregnant woman; listeriosis; smallpox, S. aureus (GISA/VISA) and S. aureus (GRSA/VRSA) were added to the reporting requirements as of July 4, 1999. Paralytic shellfish poisoning is now referred to as neurotoxic shellfish poisoning.

This page was last modified on: 10/26/2012 09:49:18