|
 EPI UPDATE
A weekly publication by the Bureau of Epidemiology
For August 23, 2000
"The reason for collecting, analyzing and disseminating information on a disease is to control that disease. Collection and analysis should not be allowed to consume resources if action does not follow."
--Foege WH et al. Int. J of Epidemiology 1976; 5:29-37.
Richard S. Hopkins, MD, MSPH, Bureau Chief, State Epidemiologist
Don Ward, Surveillance Section Administrator, Epi Update Managing Editor
Jill H. Parker, MSP, Epi Update Editor
Bureau of Epidemiology Frequent Contributors:
|
Steven Wiersma, MD, MPH,
Deputy State Epidemiologist |
William J. Bigler, PhD, MS,
Senior Epidemiologist |
Jodi Baldy, MPH,
Biological Scientist IV |
|
Ursula E. Bauer, PhD,
Chronic Disease Epidemiologist |
Lisa Conti, DVM, MPH,
State Public Health Veterinarian |
Regional Epidemiologists:
|
Dolly Katz, PhD, MPH,
SE Florida |
Roger Sanderson, RN, MA,
SW Florida |
Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD,
NE Florida Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD, |
Zuber Mulla, MSPH,
Central Florida Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD, |
Please print out this material and share with epidemiology staff, county health department directors, administrators, medical directors, nursing directors, environmental health directors and others with an interest in information of this type. Thank you.
The Bureau of Epidemiology is available 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week for consultation at our main number (850/245-4401) PLEASE NOTE:
Consultation after 5 p.m. & on weekends is intended for emergencies.
In this issue:
Don’t Forget to Register for the Annual Statewide Epidemiology Seminar to be Held in Clearwater, October 5-6, 2000
Annual Statewide Epidemiology Seminar (ASES) Call for Posters
Immunization Update 2000 Satellite Teleconference
Grand Rounds for August 29, 2000
Summary of Infections Reported to Vibrio Surveillance System, 1999
Arbovirus Activity Update
Other Reflections from Florida’s Public Health Past
Florida Past - To Bathe or Not to Bathe!
Weekly Disease Table: Week 33
1. Don’t Forget to Register for the Annual Statewide Epidemiology Seminar to be Held in Clearwater, October 5-6, 2000
The Bureau of Epidemiology is pleased to announce that the next Annual Statewide Epidemiology Seminar (ASES) will be held in Clearwater on October 5th-6th.
The meeting will provide current information and education to public health
professionals regarding the reporting, investigation, and control of
communicable and non-infectious diseases of public health significance, with the
focus of improving the health of Florida residents and visitors. The primary
audience is county health department epidemiologists and other related staff.
Private physicians, practitioners, professionals in infection control, state and
private laboratory staff, etc. are also welcome. Students enrolled in a public
health program are also encouraged to participate in the annual seminar.
Conference Registration
The regular registration fee for the ASES is $100 if postmarked on or before September 27, 2000 ($120 if submitted after September 27, 2000). Students providing valid identification are offered registration at a discounted fee of $50 if postmarked on or before September 27, 2000 ($60 if submitted after that date). Attached is the conference registration form. Registration forms and payments should be mailed or faxed to:
Gulfcoast North AHEC, Inc.
6763 Land O’ Lakes Blvd.
Land O’ Lakes, FL 34639
Note: Cancellations must be confirmed in writing (fax acceptable) and received by the Gulfcoast North AHEC by 5:00 pm on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 to receive a full refund. Refunds will not be offered for "no shows;" however, substitutions are welcome without additional cost.
Hotel Information
The ASES will be held at the Belleview Biltmore in Clearwater, Florida. A block of rooms has been reserved for the occasion ranging from $86 (single/double occupancy) to $159 per night. To obtain the special conference rate, reservations should be made no later than September 4, 2000. If you can not attend the meeting, please cancel your reservations no later than seven (7) days prior to your scheduled arrival data to avoid forfeiture of deposit. Please contact the Belleview Biltmore to make your reservations.
2. Annual Statewide Epidemiology Seminar (ASES) Call for Posters
Kathryn Snavely, MPH, Bureau of Epidemiology
The Bureau of Epidemiology is actively soliciting poster submissions for the Annual Statewide Epidemiology Seminar being held on October 5th and 6th in Clearwater. Poster presentations give conference participants the opportunity to present findings to the meeting in a less formal atmosphere and to interact more closely with other attendees. Some examples of poster subjects include results of an outbreak investigation, new prevention programs at the local level, or new laboratory methods being used in disease control.
The format for posters will follow a basic scientific paper outline where applicable:
Background - the problem under investigation or a hypothesis;
Methods - the experimental methods used (including numbers of microorganisms, cases or patients);
Results - the essential results obtained in summary form;
Conclusion - a summary of your findings, which are supported by your results. Number the conclusions, if multiple ones are presented
Posters can be displayed as 3-fold foam core boards or any other method. Whatever method you choose, be sure that you have a primary and back-up plan for hanging or presenting the poster. Technical assistance for displaying posters will be available through the Bureau of Epidemiology. Please contact Kathryn Snavely for additional information.
The posters will be displayed in the evening on October 5th, the first day of the seminar. There is no deadline for poster submission because we will not be printing up a list of abstracts.
3. Immunization Update 2000 Satellite Teleconference
Hank Janowski, MPH, Chief, Bureau of Immunization
The Department of Health, Bureau of Immunization, in conjunction with the Office of Performance Improvement, is making available the Immunization Update 2000 interactive satellite teleconference through the Department of Health Telnet Videoconference Sites on September 14, 2000 from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. (EDT). A second broadcast will air from 12:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. (EDT) that same day. The content of this teleconference is most appropriate for clinic staff, nursing personnel, physicians, particularly those who administer vaccines. Anticipated topics include:
1. Update on Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine
2. Update on Influenza Vaccine
3. Brief discussion on Anthrax
4. Update on Polio
5. Update on Hep B Vaccine
6. Adolescent Schedule
7. Update on Meningococcal Vaccine
8. Other topics as deemed necessary
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will offer continuing education credits for a variety of professions based on 2.5 hours of instruction (see attached course announcement). County health departments that have a Florida Board of Nursing Continuing Education Provider number may opt to grant contact hours following Florida Board of Nursing protocol.
To participate in the course, please register with your local site coordinator no later than August 31, 2000. No registration will be accepted after that date.
For the name and telephone number of the site coordinator in your area, please
contact Linda Zeigler of the Bureau of Immunization.
4. Grand Rounds for August 29, 2000
"Florida's Quest for Public Health: An Epidemiologic Retrospective"
William J. Bigler, PhD,MS, Senior Epidemiologist, Bureau of Epidemiology
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM EST
Abstract
In tracing the history of the Department of Health (DOH) and its predecessors, one can easily develop an appreciation for how much progress has been made during the past century. Over the years, dramatic political, economic, and social changes have caused development of the state's public-health agencies to have many twists-and-turns and ups-and-downs. Even though the events of Florida's history have sometimes driven public health initiatives, there have been other times the agency or the federal government with the support of allied agencies and organizations, both public and private, have taken the lead. The end result has been that overall the quality of life we all enjoy today in Florida is directly linked to a wide variety of public-health-related activities.
Archival reports vividly describe the hardships that Florida's public-health pioneers endured and the enormous amount of energy they expended to accomplish their goals. Through it all, their efforts to conduct surveys, investigate epidemics, evaluate new treatment and prevention measures and initiate special studies have consistently had an impact on policy decisions, health-care practices and public attitudes. Then as now, some unique and revolutionary concepts proposed to prevent disease were met with widespread public and professional resistance, while others were embraced without question.
Today the DOH has a unique opportunity to take a leadership position in epidemiologic research. With a clear vision, consistent approach, resourceful planning, creative financing, a bit of luck, and support from like-minded researchers throughout the state the Department should be able to use its capabilities to advance public health dramatically as we move into the new millennium.
Additional Information
Further details regarding the audio-conference call and PowerPoint files will be posted on the Bureau of Epidemiology Intranet web site. Information about upcoming topics and presenters will also be posted in future Epi Updates. If either of these access points is unavailable to you, please e-mail Melanie Black
to request presentation materials.
Important
While we realize you might not always be able to call in at 11:00 AM, it can be distracting to the speakers and others in the audience when participants dial-in throughout the hour. Please try to call in on time and remember to put your phones on mute so as not to disturb others. Thank you for your cooperation.
5. Summary of Infections Reported to Vibrio Surveillance System, 1999
(Below is an excerpt from a CSTE letter summarizing Vibrio infections reported to CDC in 1999. Tables and figures are included in the attachments.)
This report summarizes Vibrio infections reported to CDC through the Vibrio Surveillance System in 1999. It is broken down by two categories: non-cholera Vibrio infections, both those reported from Gulf Coast and those from other states, and Vibrio infections causing cholera.
Non-cholera Vibrio infections
Since 1988, CDC has maintained a voluntary surveillance system for culture-confirmed Vibrio infections in the Gulf Coast states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. Using a standardized form, investigators obtain clinical data, information about underlying illness, and epidemiologic data on seafood consumption and exposure to seawater in the week before illness. When a food item is implicated in illness, a traceback investigation is performed by state field investigators or the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA). Surveillance data have been used to identify environmental risk factors, retail food outlets where high-risk exposures occur, and target groups that may benefit from consumer education.
In recent years, other states have been invited to participate in the Vibrio Surveillance System, and surveillance has expanded to include FoodNet sites as well as states along both the East and West coasts. Surveillance for sporadic cases is the primary focus of this system, although outbreak-associated culture-confirmed cases are also included. Isolates from V. parahaemolyticus cases that occur in the Gulf Coast or FoodNet sites are submitted to CDC for serotyping.
A total of 342 cases of culture-confirmed non-cholera Vibrio infections were reported to the Vibrio Surveillance System in 1999, 164 from 5 Gulf Coast states (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) and 178 from 17 other states (Figure 1). Among patients about whom this information was available, 141 (46%) of 311 were hospitalized and 33 (11%) of 300 died. Although V. parahaemolyticus was the most frequently reported Vibrio species, V. vulnificus accounted for 31 (94%) of the 33 reported deaths.
Syndromes
Tables 1 and 2 divide the data into Gulf coast versus non-Gulf coast residents. The following is a summary of data from all sites: Three hundred (88%) of the Vibrio infections could be categorized into one of three well-recognized syndromes. One hundred seventy-two (50%) were classified as gastroenteritis, defined as an illness with diarrhea, vomiting, or abdominal cramps, no evidence of a wound infection, and Vibrio spp. isolated from stool alone. Eighty-two (24%) illnesses were classified as wound infections, in which the patient incurred a wound before or during exposure to seawater
or seafood drippings, and Vibrio spp. was subsequently cultured from blood, a wound, or a normally sterile site. There were 46 (13%) cases of primary septicemia, characterized by fever or shock in which Vibrio spp. Was isolated from blood or a normally sterile site, and no evidence of a wound infection (Tables 1 and 2). In 22 (6%) cases, the organism was cultured from ear, eye, gallbladder, urine, or the abdomen; and 20 (6%) case report forms contained insufficient information to be classified into one of these syndromes, all of these cases were reported as "other or unknown" syndrome.
Among illnesses with one Vibrio species in which the species was determined, V. parahaemolyticus accounted for 95/166 (57%) of the gastrointestinal illnesses, while V. vulnificus was isolated in 41/45 (91%) of septicemia cases. Although V. vulnificus was isolated in 28/71 (39%) wound infections, V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus made up 20% and 23%, respectively.
Seasonality
Gastrointestinal Vibrio infections had a clear seasonal peak, with 108 (63%) occurring between June and October. The majority of both wound infections, 69 (84%), and septicemia infections, 41 (89%) occurred between April and October (Figure 2).
Exposures
Of the 218 persons with gastroenteritis or septicemia, 178/191 (93%) consumed seafood in the 7 days before illness onset. Of the 91 (51%) who consumed a single seafood, 61 (67%) ate oysters, 11 (12%) ate shrimp, 9 (10%) ate fish, 8 (9%) ate crabs, and 2 persons ate only clams or lobster. Of the 86 persons who provided information, 62 (72%) consumed their seafood raw.
Laboratory
In 102 (46%) of 222 Vibrio cases, the species was confirmed by the state public health laboratory. Twenty-four clinical isolates of V. parahaemolyticus from 23 patients in five states (CA, GA, MN, OR, and TX) were submitted to CDC for serotyping. Of the 23 patients, 5 (22%) had serotype O3:K6, 4 (17%) had O4:K12, while the remaining 14 patients had 10 other serotypes.
Cholera Infections
Five cases of toxigenic V. cholerae O1 from 4 states were identified in 1999 (Table 3). Three patients acquired their infection in India, one in Liberia, and one had no history of travel but consumed foods brought from the Philippines the week before illness. All patients had gastroenteritis. Three patients were hospitalized, and none died.
6. Arbovirus Activity Update
Ms. Robin Oliveri, Arbovirus Surveillance Coordinator and Dr. Lisa Conti, State Public Health Veterinarian
There are currently no Arbovirus Medical Alerts issued for the state. During the period August 13 through August 18, 2000, the following arbovirus* activity was recorded for Florida:
(*Mosquito-borne virus including St. Louis encephalitis virus, Eastern Equine encephalitis virus, West Nile encephalitis virus and dengue virus)
Human: No new arbovirus cases were reported to the State Health Office. For year-to-date, 2 dengue cases were identified (residents of Putnam and Volusia counties, respectively). (Source: county health departments and Department of Health (DOH) laboratories from medical providers)
Sentinel chickens: Three sentinel chicken seroconversions to SLE were identified in Lee County and one EEE in Putnam county (574 chickens tested). To date, 8,660 chicken sera have been tested (Source: DOH Tampa Laboratory from mosquito control agencies and county health departments).
Wild Bird: Four seroconversions in captive crowned cranes to EEE were identified in Osceola county. To date, 159 non-sentinel bird sera have been tested (Source: DOH Tampa Laboratory).
Equine: No horses were reported with arboviruses (Source: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Laboratory from veterinarians).
Bird Mortality: Two dead birds were reported from the following counties: Bay –1 and Escambia-1. Although we are collecting information about any dead bird, at this time, the DOH is priority testing crows that have died within 24 hours of report (Source: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission website ).
Mosquito Pools: No mosquito pools were tested for arboviruses during this period. (Source: DOH Laboratory and mosquito control agencies).
7. Other Reflections from Florida’s Public Health Past
I am moved by Dr. Bigler's "Florida Past" articles and thought I'd share:
Before becoming a health department director I worked the health department clinics in and around Orange County. It was not unusual for us to travel from one end of the county to provide clinical services and then drive clear across to the other end to do afternoon clinics and then perhaps treat patients at the STD clinic in evening clinic.
Among many vivid memories are two that stand out:
1. It was back in the late 1980s and during pediatrics clinic we had seen a beautiful little girl presented by her grandparents for a pediatric physical and immunizations. The three of them left the clinic with child in arm and away they went in Grandpop's old trusty/rusty pick-up. It turns out he was quite a fisherman.
Soon thereafter the three ran back into clinic, child again in arms yet crying desperately. The child had been riding on the floorboard and found a wonderful purple plastic worm, it smelled like grape and unfortunately when it was tasted, the hook caught the child's lip. We quickly found a wire cutter and out came the hook. The little girl recovered quickly; however, grandmother and grandfather father remained quite shaken.
2. The other picture imbedded in my mind occurred completely on the other end of the county. I had been providing prenatal care to a very young mother, yet it was shortly after birth that mother (now 13 years old) brought her child in for a well child check.
The young mother and baby were accompanied by Grandmom. I could not have taken a more poignant picture if I were a professional photographer; for sitting in the waiting room was a baby held by a mere child with her mother; the baby's mom had the baby's pacifier in her mouth.
Signed "anonymous"
8. Florida Past - To Bathe or Not to Bathe !
William J. Bigler, PhD
During its early years the State Board of Health never missed an opportunity to use the Florida Health Notes to " give the public instructive information on matters pertaining to the preservation of health and protection against disease." It seems that the Board felt compelled to "set the matter straight" when it perceived that the latest scientific information needed some interpretation. Excerpts from the following article entitled "BATHS" published in the March 1914 issue of Florida Health Notes highlight the Board's official stance on the dos and don'ts of bathing.
To bathe or not to bathe!
Of course, we all thought that matter had been settled definitely long ago, when the old Romans spent big fortunes in building their bathing places or marble, surrounding them with every luxury imaginable, and made their bathing a kind of social function, inviting in the neighbors and spending hours at the entertainment.
But it seems to have been questioned recently by some eminent medical authorities writing in their journals, whether or not the average man and woman bathe too frequently; whether they should take a cold plunge or shower or a hot bath; whether they should use soap or not, and if so, what kind; whether it is safe to bathe immediately before or immediately after a meal - indeed the whole subject seems to have been upset and must be settled over again for the satisfaction of those who are disturbed by the learned discussion of the ultra-scientific.
It is a matter about which each of us is quite likely to have rather fixed views and probably most of us consider bathing next to eating an absolute necessity hygienically and for comfort...But the matter of bathing is an important one, especially in warmer climates like that of Florida, and, strange as it may seem, the bath may be much abused, wrongly used or neglected with the result of serious physical harm.
The primary use of the bath is to secure cleanliness, to remove from the surface of the skin the accumulations of refuse matter brought out through the pores… The use of the cold bath is a matter of individual choice. The tendency of a bath of a temperature very much lower than that of the body, is to drive the blood from the surface and to reduce congestion in the internal organs, the heart, liver, lungs or brain…
The physiological effect of the hot bath is to draw the blood to the surface and away from the brain, producing a lassitude which makes exertion either of the body or the brain a decided effort, until normal conditions are restored. Therefore, the hot bath should never be taken by the individual in normal health, in the morning, when the day's work is before him. The proper time is just before retiring, when sleep will be encouraged by the resulting "tired" condition…
The relation of the bath to meal time is not generally well understood. The function of digestion draws the energy of the physical system to the stomach. Whatever may interfere with the normal attraction of the blood toward the stomach at such time, will interrupt or arrest the process of digestion…Eating or digestion should be under normal conditions of the body, undisturbed by extraordinary demands upon the circulatory system. Therefore, don't bathe within an hour before dinner nor within two hours after.
How often should we bathe? Often enough to keep clean. A plunge or a shower in the morning with a temperature adapted to the physical condition of the individual, with a sponge-off at night, are not excessive, and we may preserve health with one good washing each day.
Obviously the warm or hot bath is almost a necessity to everyone occasionally for cleanliness, because for that purpose it is more effective than cold water. And the matter of cleanliness brings up the subject of soap, for soap is a necessity…
The essential differences between the numerous varieties of soap are in their relative percentages of available alkali. Too much of this will attack the skin itself eating into it and removing not only the dirt but the epidermis - the outer covering - if allowed to remain long… For the baths of very young babies the only soap allowable is one very low in its content of alkali. And so the kind of soap to be used safely is a thing to be determined by each person, according to the texture of the skin…
The probability is small that the average Floridian abuses the bath, either in summer or winter, at least not by overindulgence. The bathroom is as much a necessity as the dining room in the Florida home. Cleanliness is essential to healthfulness and both are conducive to a spirit of godliness, of which no one has credited Florida with having more than its due share.
9. Weekly Disease Table: Week 33
County-Confirmed Cases, Sorted Alphabetically by Disease
(NR represents years that the disease lacked status as a reportable condition)
|
DISEASE |
1997 TO DATE |
1998 TO DATE |
1999 TO DATE |
3 YEAR AVERAGE
TO DATE |
1999 TOTAL CASES |
2000 TO DATE |
|
Anthrax |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Botulism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
|
Brucellosis |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
Campylobacteriosis |
608 |
445 |
570 |
541 |
988 |
596 |
|
Ciguatera |
4 |
7 |
2 |
4.3 |
2 |
3 |
|
Cryptosporidiosis |
69 |
78 |
77 |
74.7 |
180 |
56 |
|
Cyclosporiasis |
62 |
6 |
3 |
23.7 |
5 |
6 |
|
Dengue |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
Diphtheria |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
E. coli O157:H7 |
34 |
24 |
29 |
29 |
55 |
47 |
|
E. coli , other (known serotype) |
5 |
3 |
13 |
7 |
15 |
8 |
|
Ehrlichiosis, Human |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Encephalitis, Eastern Equine |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0.7 |
3 |
0 |
|
Encephalitis, St. Louis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
|
Encephalitis, other (known organism) |
7 |
3 |
3 |
4.3 |
5 |
6 |
|
Encephalitis, post-infectious1 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
5.7 |
14 |
4 |
|
Giardiasis (acute) |
896 |
777 |
641 |
771.3 |
1322 |
750 |
|
Haemophilus influenzae , invasive1 |
16 |
29 |
35 |
26.7 |
53 |
34 |
|
Hansen’s Disease (Leprosy) |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1.7 |
3 |
3 |
|
Hantavirus Infection |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome |
3 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
|
Hemorrhagic Fever |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Hepatitis A |
290 |
310 |
400 |
333.3 |
796 |
297 |
|
Hepatitis B |
236 |
249 |
248 |
244.3 |
528 |
287 |
|
Hepatitis C |
NR |
NR |
32 |
NR |
55 |
21 |
|
Hepatitis Non-A, Non-B |
57 |
55 |
3 |
38.3 |
10 |
6 |
|
Hepatitis, perinatal B |
NR |
NR |
1 |
NR |
|
1 |
|
Hepatitis, unspecified |
5 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
17 |
6 |
|
Hepatitis, +HBsAg, pregnant woman |
NR |
NR |
187 |
NR |
448 |
245 |
|
Lead Poisoning |
841 |
1094 |
1022 |
985.7 |
1810 |
505 |
|
Legionellosis |
16 |
22 |
14 |
17.3 |
27 |
28 |
|
Leptospirosis |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0.3 |
1 |
1 |
|
Listeriosis |
NR |
NR |
17 |
NR |
37 |
18 |
|
Lyme Disease |
15 |
25 |
17 |
19 |
51 |
18 |
|
Malaria |
47 |
35 |
52 |
44.7 |
97 |
52 |
|
Measles |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2.3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Meningococcal Disease (N. meningitidis) |
103 |
89 |
72 |
88 |
122 |
76 |
|
Meningitis, Group B Streptococci |
11 |
11 |
10 |
10.7 |
14 |
11 |
|
Meningitis, Haemophilus influenzae1 |
6 |
11 |
11 |
9.3 |
13 |
4 |
|
Meningitis, Streptococcus pneumoniae |
52 |
56 |
71 |
59.7 |
97 |
59 |
|
Meningitis, Listeria monocytogenes |
2 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
14 |
4 |
|
Meningitis, other bacterial (including unspecified) |
35 |
38 |
36 |
36.3 |
62 |
59 |
|
Mercury Poisoning |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1.3 |
7 |
7 |
|
Mumps |
8 |
9 |
3 |
6.7 |
6 |
2 |
|
Neurotoxic Shellfish Poisoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Pertussis |
47 |
25 |
56 |
42.7 |
85 |
40 |
|
Plague |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Poliomyelitis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Psittacosis |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
|
Q Fever2 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
0 |
0 |
|
Rabies, Animal |
191 |
131 |
120 |
147.3 |
186 |
98 |
|
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1.7 |
2 |
1 |
|
Rubella, including congenital |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1.3 |
1 |
3 |
|
Salmonellosis |
1096 |
1271 |
1375 |
1247.3 |
3071 |
1319 |
|
Shigellosis |
742 |
1297 |
861 |
966.7 |
1491 |
806 |
|
Smallpox |
NR |
NR |
0 |
NR |
0 |
0 |
|
Staphylococcus aureus, (GISA/VISA) |
NR |
NR |
0 |
NR |
0 |
0 |
|
Staphylococcus aureus, (GRSA/VRSA) |
NR |
NR |
0 |
NR |
0 |
0 |
|
Streptococcal Disease, invasive Group A |
24 |
31 |
41 |
32 |
94 |
84 |
|
Streptococcus pneumoniae , invasive disease |
131 |
291 |
359 |
260.3 |
701 |
673 |
|
Tetanus |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1.7 |
3 |
0 |
|
Toxoplasmosis |
4 |
7 |
10 |
7 |
17 |
6 |
|
Typhoid Fever |
5 |
10 |
22 |
12.3 |
23 |
7 |
|
Vibrio cholerae (serogrp O1) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Vibrio cholerae (serogrp Non-O1) |
6 |
6 |
8 |
6.7 |
10 |
4 |
|
Vibrio vulnificus |
8 |
15 |
10 |
11 |
23 |
3 |
|
Vibrio other (including unspecified) |
20 |
46 |
26 |
30.7 |
48 |
24 |
|
Yellow Fever |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 Haemophilus influenzae can be the agent responsible for disease under three of the reportable conditions listed-: "Haemophilus influenzae, invasive" and under "Encephalitis, post infectious." Cases of Haemophilus influenzae meningitis are reported under "Meningitis, H. influenzae."
2 The reportable disease rule was revised in June 2000. Amebiasis and Toxic Shock Syndrome (Staphylococcal and Streptococcal) were deleted from the list of reportable diseases. Q Fever was added to the list of reportable diseases.
|