Department of Health Home A to Z Topics About the Department of Health Site Map Contact Us - Opens in a new window

Epidemiology Home

Health Topics (A-Z)

Related Links

Contact Us

   

Florida Department of HealthEPI UPDATE

A weekly publication by the Bureau of Epidemiology

For November 1, 2000

"The reason for collecting, analyzing and disseminating information on a disease is to control that disease. Collection and analysis should not be allowed to consume resources if action does not follow."

--Foege WH et al. Int. J of Epidemiology 1976; 5:29-37.

Richard S. Hopkins, MD, MSPH, Bureau Chief, State Epidemiologist

Don Ward, Surveillance Section Administrator, Epi Update Managing Editor

Jill H. Parker, MSP, Epi Update Editor

Bureau of Epidemiology Frequent Contributors:

Steven Wiersma, MD, MPH,

Deputy State Epidemiologist

Jodi Baldy, MPH,

Biological Scientist IV

Ursula E. Bauer, PhD,

Chronic Disease Epidemiologist

Lisa Conti, DVM, MPH,

State Public Health Veterinarian

Regional Epidemiologists:

Dolly Katz, PhD, MPH,

SE Florida

Roger Sanderson, RN, MA,

SW Florida

Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD,

NE Florida Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD,

Zuber Mulla, MSPH,

Central Florida Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD,

Please print out this material and share with epidemiology staff, county health department directors, administrators, medical directors, nursing directors, environmental health directors and others with an interest in information of this type. Thank you.

The Bureau of Epidemiology is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for consultation at our main number (850/245-4401) PLEASE NOTE: Consultation after 5 p.m. & on weekends is intended for emergencies.

In this issue:

1. Merlin Web-based Reporting System Training Update

2. Weekly Influenza Summary Updates to Begin Next Week

3. NARMS 1999 Annual Report Summary

4. Weekly Arbovirus Activity Summary

5. Supercourse in Epidemiology, the Internet, Prevention, and Global Health Offered by the University of Pittsburgh; Organizers Looking for Public Health Professionals Fluent in Russian Language

6. Weekly Disease Table: Week 43


 

1. Merlin Web-based Reporting System Training Update

Don Ward, Surveillance Section Administrator

Merlin training dates have now been established for Bay, Highlands and Broward counties. The Bay County training session is scheduled for Tuesday, December 5th. The Highlands County training session is scheduled for Thursday, November 16th. The Broward County training session is scheduled for Wednesday, December 6th. Due to low registration, the November 9th training session scheduled in Tallahassee has been cancelled.

Please note that while we intend to provide training to everyone who wants to become a Merlin user, the primary audience for this initial training includes those who will be entering case reporting data (probably the same folks who now complete the 2016 forms) and their supervisors. Merlin training for all groups of users will be ongoing.

Updated schedules will be published in upcoming Epi Updates. Please register as soon as possible to avoid training session cancellation.

The confirmed training schedule (valid as of 11/01/00) is as follows:

Date Location Building/Room

November 9 (Thurs.) Duval County

November 14 (Tues.) Escambia County

November 15 (Wed.) Orange County

November 16 (Thurs.) Highlands County

November 17 (Fri.) Tallahassee 2585/110A

November 20 (Mon.) Tallahassee 4052/215L

November 28 (Tues.) Indian River CHD

November 29 (Wed.) Collier CHD

December 1 (Fri.) Tallahassee 2585/110A

December 4 (Mon.) Alachua CHD

December 5 (Tues) Bay CHD

December 6 (Weds.) Broward CHD

December 8 (Fri.) Tallahassee 2585/110A

December 11 (Mon.) Tallahassee 4052/215L

December 12 (Tues.) Hillsborough CHD

December 15 (Fri.) Tallahassee 2585/110A

December 19 (Tues.) Tallahassee 4052/215L

 

2. Weekly Influenza Summary Updates to Begin Next Week

Carina Blackmore, MS Vet. Med., PhD

The national reporting system for sentinel surveillance of influenza is experiencing technical difficulties. However, data from Florida suggests low levels of influenza activity. Overall, two percent of patients seeking care by physicians in the influenza sentinel surveillance met the case definition for ILI (> 100 F + cough and or sore throat). Influenza-like illness activity was detected in 10 counties from Duval to Miami-Dade. Higher flu activity than expected for this time of year (>3%) was reported by physicians in Orange, Pasco and Polk counties. No new influenza isolations were made in our state laboratories.

Do you have or know of a flu outbreak in your hospital, an assisted living facility or in a school? Please contact us!

Why?

The Bureau of Epidemiology coordinates a voluntary reporting system for influenza. We are interested in hearing about any outbreaks of influenza-like illness (fever > 100 degrees Fahrenheit AND cough or sore throat) in Florida. We use this information to give feedback on the level of influenza activity to the community in our state. It also helps us monitor the efficacy of the flu vaccine. The state lab does outbreak-related viral cultures for free. Virus isolates are regularly sent to CDC where they follow the genetic changes of the virus. These changes can eventually cause vaccine failures.

We can also provide help with outbreak investigations and control. In addition, rapid antigen testing (for flu A) is available at the state lab. By getting a quicker diagnosis it will be possible to institute control measures, such as preventive antiviral therapy, more rapidly and effectively.

How?

Please call your regional epidemiologist or the Bureau of Epidemiology in Tallahassee. If you know the attack rate, the mortality rate and the vaccine coverage in the population of interest, great! If not, we will help you figure it out.

When?

The earlier the better. Viruses can only be isolated from acutely ill patients. We can help you get swabs for virus isolation and rapid antigen testing.

   

3. NARMS 1999 Annual Report Summary

Jodi Baldy, Staff Epidemiologist, Bureau of Epidemiology

The CDC’s National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System prospectively monitors the antimicrobial resistance of non-Typhi Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157, Shigella, and Salmonella Typhi isolates. In 1999 there were 17 NARMS health department participants (CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, KS, Los Angeles County, MD, MN, MA, NJ, New York City, NY, OR, TN, WA, and WV), representing approximately 103 million persons (38% of the U.S. population) and 7 of the 9 U.S. Public Health Service regions.

NARMS-participating public health laboratories select every tenth isolate of non-Typhoid Salmonella and Shigella, every fifth E. coli O157, and each Salmonella Typhi (restricted to one isolate per person) received at their laboratory and forward the isolates to CDC for susceptibility testing.

Non-Typhi Salmonella – CDC tested 1499 isolates; 100 (7%) were from Florida. Overall, the antimicrobial agents to which Salmonella demonstrated the highest prevalence of resistance were tetracycline (19%), sulfamethoxazole (18%), streptomycin (17%), and ampicillin (16%). Sixteen (1%) isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid, six (0.4%) isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone, and one (0.1%) isolate (S. Senftenberg) was resistant to ciprofloxacin.

Among non-Typhi Salmonella isolates, 26% were resistant to one or more agents and 21% were resistant to two or more agents. Of the isolates tested, 24% were serotype Typhimurium and 18% were serotype Enteriditis. Among S. Typhimurium isolates, 49% were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents and among S. Enteriditis isolates, 16% were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents. The serotypes with the highest proportion of pansusceptible isolates were Javiana, (98%), Thompson (97%), and Branderup (96%).

In recent years, a mutidrug-resistant strain of S. Typhimurium has been identified. This strain is characterized not only by the multidrug-resistant pattern, but also by the phage type – DT104. Overall, 28% of the isolates were resistant to the five antimicrobial agents, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (ACSSuT), to which S. Typhimuirium DT104 is commonly resistant. Florida contributed 14 (4%) of the S. Typhimurium isolates, and of these 6 (43%) were ACSSuT.

A second penta-resistant pattern – resistance to ampicillin, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (AKSSuT) - also has emerged among Salmonella Typhimurium. These strains, however, are not DT104 by phage typing. Among the S. Typhimurium isolates tested, 11% had the AKSSuT resistance pattern. One (7.1%) isolate from Florida exhibited this pattern.

One Salmonella isolate was resistant to ciprofloxacin. The percentage of isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs >0.25 increased from 0.4% in 1996 (5/1326) to 1% in 1999 (15/1499). The percentage of Salmonella isolates resistant to nalidixic acid (a quinolone) also increased in 1999 (1%) from 1996 (0.4%). The percentage of Salmonella isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone increased from 0.1% in 1996 to 2% in 1999.

NOTE: Although antimicrobial therapy is not recommended for routine treatment of salmonellosis, appropriate antimicrobial therapy can be life-saving for patients with invasive disease. Isolates from such infections should be monitored for antimicrobial resistance, particularly resistance to floroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin). Fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin), third generation cephalosporins (e.g., ceftriaxone), and gentamicin are commonly used antimicrobial agents for the treatment of invasive salmonellosis. Resistance to nalidixic acid – the prototypic quinolone – has been found in some instances to precede resistance to the fluoroquinolones. Although increasing, the low prevalence of quinolone resistance in Salmonella in the U.S. and the lack of domestically acquired fluoroquinolone-resistant strains is in sharp contrast to the situation in England and Wales, where increasing prevalence has been reported. DT104, the second most frequently isolated Salmonella strain from humans in the U.K. in 1995, has emerged widely in the United States. Since fluoroquinolones are important in treating invasive Salmonella infections and most DT104 isolates are already resistant to a number of antimicrobial agents, continued monitoring of salmonella strains for resistance patterns is necessary. The development of fluoroquinolone resistance in a strain of Salmonella that causes severe human illness could have serious public health implications.

Salmonella Typhi – CDC tested 166 isolates of S. Typhi; 19 (11%) were submitted from Florida. Overall, 29% of the S. Typhi isolates were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents. The most common resistances were to nalidixic acid (19%), sulfamethoxazole (17%), or streptomycin (14%). Ampicillin resistance was 13% and chloramphenicol resistance was 12%. None of the isolates tested were resistant to ciprofloxacin.

NOTE: Since 1989, strains of Salmonella Typhi resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and trimethoprim (i.e., multidrug-resistant [MDR] strains) have been responsible for numerous outbreaks in countries in the Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia, and Africa. MDR strains have also been isolated with increasing frequency from immigrant workers in countries in the Arabian Gulf, as well as in developed countries from returning travelers. As a result of the widespread dissemination of such strains, chloramphenicol can no longer be regarded as the first-line drug for typhoid fever. Because strains are also resistant to ampicillin and trimethoprim, the efficacy of these antibiotics has also been impaired, and ciprofloxacin is now the drug of choice for typhoid fever.

Shigella – Among the 341 isolates tested, 91% were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents and 65% were resistant to two or more agents. The most common resistances among all shigellae were to ampicillin (77%), tetracycline (57%), streptomycin (56%), sulfamethoxazole (55%), or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (51%). Shigella sonnei accounted for 73% of isolates – these were most frequently resistant to ampicillin (80%), sulfamethoxazole (54%), or streptomycin (52%). Shigella flexneri, representing 23% of all isolates tested, were most commonly resistant to tetracycline (92%), ampicillin (77%), or chloramphenicol (64%). None of the isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone or ciprofloxacin. Florida submitted 14 isolates, or 4% of the total.

NOTE: There is a high prevalence of resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin among Shigella isolates; these agents may no longer be appropriate for the empiric treatment of Shigella infections. Although no resistance to ciprofloxacin was identified, 2% of isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid, indicating the potential for the emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance. Continued monitoring of antimicrobial resistance is needed to inform physicians of effective treatment strategies for patients with Shigella infections.

E. coli O157 – 292 isolates were tested for antimicrobial sensitivity and of these, Florida submitted 13 (4%). Among all isolates tested, 10% were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents and 4% were resistant to two or more agents. The most common resistances were to sulfamethoxazole (8%), tetracycline (3%), or streptomycin (3%).

NOTE: Until recently, E. coli O157 isolates were almost uniformly sensitive to antimicrobial agents. However, since the 1990s, these and other shiga toxin-producing E. coli strains have demonstrated slowly increasing levels of resistance to certain antibiotics, particularly streptomycin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline. Notwithstanding, antimicrobial therapy for O157 infection has not been demonstrated to be safe and efficacious, except for cases of cystitis and polynephritis. Tracking of antibiotic resistance in this organism reflects concern for the development and transmission of resistance genes to other pathogenic organisms. Multi-resistant E. coli have been selected by the use of broad spectrum antimicrobials in both livestock and humans. The development of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli creates problems due to their high propensity to disseminate antimicrobial resistance genes, which have been traced from E. coli in animals to E. coli in humans. The development of resistance in strains that are currently susceptible to antimicrobials could compromise therapy options.

The complete NARMS 1997-1999 Annual Reports are posted on the NARMS Website.

 

4. Weekly Arbovirus Activity Summary

Robin Oliveri, Arbovirus Surveillance Coordinator and Dr. Lisa Conti, State Public Health Veterinarian

There are currently no Arbovirus Medical Alerts issued for the state. During the period October 21 through October 27, 2000, the following arbovirus* activity was recorded for Florida:

(*Mosquito-borne virus including St. Louis encephalitis virus, Eastern Equine encephalitis virus, West Nile encephalitis virus and dengue virus)

Sentinel chickens: Fifteen seroconversions to SLE and one seroconversion to EEE were identified. (Source: DOH Tampa Laboratory from mosquito control agencies and

county health departments).

Bird Mortality: Two dead birds were entered into the bird mortality database (Alachua-1, and Monroe-1). Although we are collecting information about any dead bird, at this time, the DOH is testing birds that have died within 24 hours prior to report. (Source: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission website).

 

5. Supercourse in Epidemiology, the Internet, Prevention, and Global Health Offered by the University of Pittsburgh; Organizers Looking for Public Health Professionals Fluent in Russian Language

The Supercourse offers a forum for information sharing among epidemiologists around the world. .

The Supercourse organizers are working to improve linkages with colleagues in Russia and are hoping to establish a Global Health Network Russian Speaking Group in the United States. If you know someone in public health who may speak Russian fluently and who would be interested in participating in the Russian Speaking Group, please contact Dmitry Ivanov, M.D., M.P.H.

 

6. Weekly Disease Table: Week 43

County-Confirmed Cases, Sorted Alphabetically by Disease

(NR represents years that the disease lacked status as a reportable condition)

DISEASE

1997 TO DATE

1998 TO DATE

1999 TO DATE

3 YEAR AVERAGE

TO DATE

1999 TOTAL CASES

2000 TO DATE

Anthrax

0

0

0

0

0

0

Botulism

0

0

3

1

4

0

Brucellosis

0

3

2

1.7

3

2

Campylobacteriosis

828

680

736

748

988

782

Ciguatera

9

7

2

6

2

12

Cryptosporidiosis

116

134

132

127.3

180

136

Cyclosporiasis

66

6

3

25

5

6

Dengue

3

4

3

3.3

3

2

Diphtheria

0

0

0

0

0

0

E. coli O157:H7

42

40

48

43.3

55

76

E. coli, other (known serotype)

6

5

13

8

15

11

Ehrlichiosis, Human

2

0

2

1.3

2

3

Encephalitis, Eastern Equine

2

0

2

1.3

3

0

Encephalitis, St. Louis

7

0

2

3

4

0

Encephalitis, post-infectious1

12

6

3

7

5

6

Encephalitis, other (known organism)

10

14

6

10

14

6

Giardiasis (acute)

1333

1196

975

1168

1322

1096

Haemophilus influenzae, invasive1

21

32

38

30.3

52

49

Hansen’s Disease (Leprosy)

0

4

3

2.3

3

4

Hantavirus Infection

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

4

11

7

7.3

7

12

Hemorrhagic Fever

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hepatitis A

446

424

567

479

796

410

Hepatitis B

306

328

336

323.3

528

387

Hepatitis C

NR

NR

39

NR

55

21

Hepatitis Non-A, Non-B

77

71

7

51.7

10

6

Hepatitis, perinatal B

NR

NR

2

NR

 

3

Hepatitis, unspecified

6

18

10

2

17

7

Hepatitis, +HBsAg, pregnant woman

NR

NR

246

NR

448

353

Lead Poisoning

1178

1503

1429

1370

1810

764

Legionellosis

22

30

19

23.7

27

40

Leptospirosis

0

1

1

0.7

1

1

Listeriosis

NR

NR

25

NR

37

27

Lyme Disease

29

39

29

32.3

51

38

Malaria

61

60

70

63.7

97

64

Measles

6

2

2

3.3

2

2

Meningococcal Disease (N. meningitidis)

124

104

90

106

122

92

Meningitis, Group B Streptococci

13

15

11

13

14

18

Meningitis, Haemophilus influenzae1

10

11

12

11

13

8

Meningitis, Streptococcus pneumoniae

64

67

79

70

97

83

Meningitis, Listeria monocytogenes

2

4

7

4.3

14

5

Meningitis, other bacterial (including unspecified)

52

48

47

49

62

82

Mercury Poisoning

2

0

4

2

7

9

Mumps

9

11

3

7.7

6

2

Neurotoxic Shellfish Poisoning

0

0

0

0

0

0

Pertussis

56

35

67

52.7

85

42

Plague

0

0

0

0

0

0

Poliomyelitis

0

0

0

0

0

0

Psittacosis

0

2

0

0.7

0

0

Q Fever2

NR

NR

NR

NR

0

0

Rabies, Animal

234

174

163

190.3

186

142

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

3

1

2

2

2

4

Rubella, including congenital

3

4

0

2.3

1

3

Salmonellosis

1802

2160

2234

2065.3

3071

2119

Shigellosis

1176

1805

1145

1375.3

1491

1049

Smallpox

NR

NR

0

NR

0

0

Staphylococcus aureus, (GISA/VISA)

NR

NR

0

NR

0

0

Staphylococcus aureus, (GRSA/VRSA)

NR

NR

0

NR

0

0

Streptococcal Disease, invasive Group A

29

36

57

40.7

94

108

Streptococcus pneumoniae, invasive disease, drug resistant

170

333

443

315.3

700

811

Tetanus

1

3

2

2

3

1

Toxoplasmosis

6

10

13

9.7

17

8

Typhoid Fever

12

13

23

16

23

9

Vibrio cholerae (serogrp O1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

Vibrio cholerae (serogrp Non-O1)

8

6

9

7.7

10

4

Vibrio vulnificus

15

25

19

19.7

23

11

Vibrio other (including unspecified)

23

57

34

38

48

34

Yellow Fever

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 Haemophilus influenzae can be the agent responsible for disease under three of the reportable conditions listed-: "Haemophilus influenzae, invasive" and under "Encephalitis, post infectious." Cases of Haemophilus influenzae meningitis are reported under "Meningitis, H. influenzae."

2 The reportable disease rule was revised in June 2000. Amebiasis and Toxic Shock Syndrome (Staphylococcal and Streptococcal) were deleted from the list of reportable diseases. Q Fever was added to the list of reportable diseases.

This page was last modified on: 10/29/2012 03:41:59